-- George Bernard Shaw
I stumbled across an article about "mixedness" on the web the other day.
"You told us all along that we had to call ourselves black because of this
so-called one drop. Now that we don't have to anymore, we choose to. Because
black is beautiful. Because black is not a burden, but a privilege." This
is a quote from author Danzy Senna, a woman of mixed-race who is the
daughter of a black/Mexican man and WASP mother. She is a very talented
woman, a gifted writer. She also shows open disdain for people who choose a
mixed-race identity. (See: "Salon Mothers Who Think | Mulatto millennium")
This is nothing new, but it is very curious.
What of today, though? In the post-civil rights era, and the moment of the
greatest waves of immigration from developing (i.e. "darker") nations to the
U.S., the adoption of a "black" identity by a phenotypically Caucasian
person is really more of a luxury. Maybe a way of expressing a deeply held
personal political philosophy or, perhaps, just of "getting over" in one's
community environment, pleasing one's parents, or "atoning" for their
bodily advantage... a host of things. Walking around the world in a "white" shell, that is rarely questioned, (You
look like a "white" person so you must be. After all, "white" people can't
have "black blood", right?), is an unavoidable privilege in this society. No one "assumes" you will steal their purse
and cross the street when they see you coming the other way. No one will
put their house up for sale if you move in next door. No one will follow
you around a store to see if someone "like you" is about to shoplift. No
one will shoot you on the sidewalk in a racist drive by attack. You will
not be stopped by the police for driving a new car that is either presumed
to be stolen or paid for with drug money. You will not be denied a
promotion to a "more visible" job because of the way you look. In fact, you
will more likely be embraced -- when it suits them -- as a "darling child"
in the "black" community because you deign to loan your Caucasian looks to
"blackness" and give self-loathing people a "bridge" to "whiteness". Oh,
and what a wonderful acquisition in the work environment, increasing
"minority hiring" statistics for industries that don't have to have an
actually "black" face around to tout that they have a "black" person
working there. When a "white" person says "I'm black" today, socially
speaking, they have virtually nothing to lose.
Most mixed individuals are of other blends. "Asian" and "white; "Hispanic"
and "white". I really am interested to hear from such individuals about how
they are "expected" to "identify" by their respective minority communities.
Perhaps they function in a saner environment, the specter of slavery not
hanging over their heads. Then again, perhaps not.
Many "black" mixed individuals look "mixed-black", or "Hispanic", or, with
that Native American ancestry dominating the features, "Asian". All of
these people face marginally less discrimination than people who appear
wholly "black", but would still be targets of white supremacist violence
and all other forms of racist persecution, subtle and overt. They
acknowledge a mixed identity not because they have shame over, or denial of
African, or Asian, or "other" roots of color. They have a mixed identity
because they really have no other. They own their mixed identity because it
is true. They claim their mixed identity because they are tired of a world
that is getting away with patently stupid judgments about people based on
facts not in evidence. They are asserting their truly blended selves, rejecting convolution, and
will not "play along". They claim their "multiness" because they sincerely want things to be better in
the future for everyone. They seek to love their uniqueness, as a refuge, when they are not truly
accepted as "full" members of the groups single race advocates would have
them identify with. Numerous members of those groups
make a point of making the mixed individual's "outsider" status clear to
them, whenever the desire to hurt others to the quick suits them. Mixed people live with their own reality. It is pointed out to them everyday when they are "mistaken" for ethnic groups they do not even remotely have a
relationship to. They stand alone, truly rational in this
irrational "Bizzaro world" of "race".
The truth is that the civil rights movement is unnerved by its own
successes. The mixed identity exists because everyone of us is human and can
be no more or no less than what we are. It is a real life, personal
experience and every mixed person, no matter what they choose to call
themselves, or why, knows it -- no matter how reasonable it is to say
otherwise.
"The reasonable man adapts to the world around him. The unreasonable man
expects the world to adapt to him. Therefore, all progress is made by
unreasonable men."
Her perspective seems to be that it is cowardly for the mixed to adopt their
own background as a reality. It is ironic, because it seems to me that there
really are no fireworks (maybe some quizzical looks) when a phenotypically
"white" woman, such as Ms Senna (photo right), says she's "black", but if a phenotypically
"white" woman, like Mariah Carey (photo below), injects a dose of reality into the world by
pointing out that she appears "white" because she predominantly is, she gets
flak from just about everybody. This is because she will not "choose sides"
in our increasingly irrelevant national "race war". Asserting reality lands a
mixed person in the position of being accused of fomenting every negative
feeling imaginable, including racism and self hatred.
Let's be frank for once, which seems to take more chutzpah than anything
else. The honest person in a political environment is usually setting
themselves up for a rocky ride. Accommodating the squeakiest voice is the path
of least resistance, and while I do not dispute the right or motivation of
any person choosing to say "I'm black", when they pretty much are "white", I
will, however, point out that it doesn't take much "courage". Historically,
it did take tremendous force of character, because acknowledging one's
black relatives, when one was phenotypically Caucasian, meant giving up all
fundamental liberty and self-actualization in an American past that was an even more rampantly racist society than the current one. Amazingly, "black"
friends and relatives would frequently assist the "mixed white" person in
disguising their complete identity, so as not to rob them of the only
opportunity for advancement they would have. It was a tremendous sacrifice
of self on the parts of both the phenotypically "white" and phenotypically
"non white" members of the community. There is one town, in Virginia, where
this was so common it was named Passing, Virginia.Also by Eleanora Hill:
|
|
|
©2001 all rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without
the express written consent of Interracial Voice.