Technology is making today's times into an age of discovery of our past.
The orbiting telescope is discovering objects in deep space that are
causing scientists to rethink old truths. The microelectronics world is
harnessing atoms into motors; they are doing things now that was only a
scientific dream a few decades ago.
And then in man's history, DNA research has upset the historical order
that historians have fed each other, and us, as the gospel truth in book
after book. For instance, a few years ago DNA research inconvertibility
showed that modern man, homo sapiens, came out of Africa and man's Eve
is an African woman who lived in sub-Saharan Africa about 200,000 years
ago.
The Neanderthals, Java Man and other offshoots died out. DNA research
shows that more than likely small groups of Eve's kin came out of
sub-equatorial Africa about 100,000 years ago and conquered the world.
The DNA research behind those conclusions concentrated on the
mitochrondial DNA which is passed from mother to daughter. When the
egg meets a sperm and becomes fertilized, that single cell has DNA that
comes equally from mother and father.
That one cell has all of the information needed to make a unique
individual. Developed human bodies have billions of cells; every single
one of them have all of the information carried by the DNA in that first
fertilized cell. That DNA is in the nucleus of the cell.
Another set of DNA, mitochondrial DNA, is within each cell but it is
outside the nucleus. It is the energy source for the embryo. Both egg
and sperm have mitochrondial DNA but, when they combine, only the egg's
mitochrondial DNA is kept and passed on from mother to daughter to
granddaughter, etc.
Within that nucleus of the cell there are twenty three pairs of
chromosomes numbered from one to twenty-two plus a couple of X
chromosomes (females) or an X and Y pair (male). Just as the
mitochrondial DNA follows the female line, DNA researchers have found
that the Y chromosome follows the male line -- from father to son to
grandson, etc.-- with only very slight mutations over generations.
Historically, that opens the door for researchers to use the Y
chromosome to pinpoint the historical mixing of populations as invading
forces invaded an area and left after a period. For instance, Genghis
Kahn almost stretched his empire from the Pacific ocean to the Atlantic
ocean. Are there a lot of Mongol Y chromosomes scattered over Europe?
Here at home, Y chromosome research has tied down the fact that Thomas
Jefferson, the father of the Declaration of Independence, was also the
father of at least one of Sally Hemmings sons. Black historians always
believed that Thomas Jefferson fathered children by Sally Hemmings, his
slave. White historians pooh poohed that notion.
Now, when researchers compared Y chromosomes from an unbroken male
line from Thomas Jefferson with an unbroken male line from Sally
Hemmings youngest child, they were able to nail down Jefferson's
parentage to a certainty.
Some historians are having a hard time putting in context Jefferson's
statements about slavery and the mixing of black and whites.
Supposedly, he thought slavery was wrong; however, it wasn't so wrong
that he couldn't have about 200 slaves.
Jefferson thought that it slaves were freed, they would have to be sent
out of the country. Otherwise, there would be a problem because blacks
and whites shouldn't mix. At that same time, he was steadily mixing it
up in the bed with his slave, Sally Hemmings.
Those contradictions don't need a deep explanation. When you examine
the lives of any of our leaders or even heroes, or ourselves, you will
find a lot of "do as I say do, not as I do." And the closer you
examine those contradictions, the wider you will find the gap between
saying and doing.
That is especially true with sex and race. Look at what happened with
politicians in the South. Prior to the Voting Rights Act and
participation of African Americans in elections, Southern white
politicians couldn't even say "Negro;" it came out Nigra or Nigger.
After blacks started voting, their pronunciation improved and they could
address African Americans as Mr. and Mrs. However, I'm sure that both
before and after the electorate changed, many of those white politicians
didn't change their side issue with black women. On that side of Thomas
Jefferson, there is a bit of him in a lot of white men in the power
scene.
Exposing of Thomas Jefferson is good for the country. It will probably
do more for race relations than all of President Clinton's panel on race
or his conversations on race.
Jefferson's actions show that he was a human with frailties that all of us
humans have more or less of.
All of us, black, brown, yellow or in between are all traceable back to
that African Eve. That means, whether we like it or not, we are all
kin, we all have similar wants and needs.
Race is more of an imprint left on us because of the area where our long
long ago forbearers trekked to as they left that section of Africa from
which we all came. Evolutionary adaptations to particular areas shaped
the externalities of our foreparents.
That little band of humans that spread out from Africa a 100,000 years
ago have little genetic diversity within but are spread over a wide
geographic area, the earth.
Contact me: (916)988-4439 (V);
(916)988-5928 (FAX); e-mail; eccurtis@earthlink.net. To see back
columns http://home.earthlink.net/~gacurtis
|
|
|
©1998 all rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without
the express written consent of Interracial Voice.
![]()